Virginia Department of Corrections Archives - School Construction News https://schoolconstructionnews.com Design - Construction - Operations Mon, 30 Nov -001 00:00:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.7.11 New Realities: It’s Time to Update Your Facility Plan https://schoolconstructionnews.com/2011/03/03/new-realities-it-s-time-update-your-facility-plan/ It has been three years since the economy entered a major downturn. What many of us hoped was an anomaly has become our new reality. I’m not being pessimistic; I’m being realistic. Life is very different now, and we have to find a way to deal with the economy while still maintaining our school facilities.

The post New Realities: It’s Time to Update Your Facility Plan appeared first on School Construction News.

]]>
It has been three years since the economy entered a major downturn. What many of us hoped was an anomaly has become our new reality. I’m not being pessimistic; I’m being realistic. Life is very different now, and we have to find a way to deal with the economy while still maintaining our school facilities.
 
From 2000 to 2008, we experienced major growth in school construction. Student enrollment increased, and buildings were replaced or renovated. School construction costs escalated as well. Since 2008, the economy has declined, which has significantly impacted funding for school maintenance and construction. However, indicators suggest the economy is beginning to stabilize. This is not to say we will return to where we left off in 2008. Rather, it is more like pushing the reset button, and 2011 becomes the new reality. With this being said, the following factors are driving the need to update previous facility master plans, or in some cases, to start over.
 
  • Economy. The prices used to estimate construction costs in the past need to be updated, as does the tax base, interest rates, and bond costs. There may be opportunities through government-backed bonds or new infrastructure resources to finance the construction, rehabilitation, or repair of public school facilities, or for the acquisition of land where a school will be built.
     
  • Enrollment. Currently, most districts are experiencing declining enrollment or much slower growth. This fact, coupled with major disruptions in the housing market, means it’s time to update enrollment projections. And, it’s time to take advantage of state-of-the-art planning tools, such as Geographic Information Systems.
     
  • AYP/Charter Schools/Restructuring. Major shifts in school reform impact the delivery of educational programs. Some low-performing schools will be closed, and more “choice” school will be developed in the public arena. This affects “traditional” schools, feeder patterns, and student transportation, especially in our cities.
     
  • Charter Schools. There is an increasing shift toward the acceptance of charter schools. Not only does this impact each state’s efforts to provide and support the charter school infrastructure, it also impacts the number and type of public schools that will be needed.
     
  • Green. Most facility plans were developed prior to the major push for energy conservation, sustainability, and high-performance facilities. Therefore, plans must be updated with green solutions in mind because energy cost won’t decrease.
     
  • Technology. Our previous focus was on infrastructure and devices. Now the focus has shifted to online learning, which has already taken hold at the university level and will affect the need for and type of school facilities in the next decade.
     
  • Deferred Maintenance. The backlog has already begun. We can’t let the neglect of the 1980s happen again.
     
  • Doing More with Less. The financial reality is clear: we must do more with fewer resources. Unfortunately, this is not likely to change any time soon. Therefore, we must come up with more creative and innovative plans to get the job done.
     
  • Partnerships. When resources become scarce, collaboration with community entities is key. Updated facility plans should embrace new forms of public-public partnerships, as well as public-private partnerships.
     
  • Strategic Focus. Where can we get the biggest bang for our buck? How can we protect and leverage our previous investments, while pinpointing new solutions that will provide the greatest benefits? School districts must be more strategic in the facility planning process. 
Each community has unique issues. This may include business closures, an early childhood program that lost funding, shifts in immigration patterns, or the implementation of new program innovation. A proactive facility plan will account for each issue and prepare the district accordingly.
Now is the time to take action. For the past three years, many school districts have been reactive and pessimistic. To be proactive and positive, they must deal with the realities outlined above.
 
NOW is the time to update facility master plans. Now is the time to build schools. Interest rates are low, construction costs have decreased, and new construction projects will become major stimulators for each local economy. If districts are not going to move on these projects right now, they need to at least get themselves positioned. It is time to seriously examine the factors mentioned above to come up with new and better ideas that meet the facility needs of our school districts.
 
William S. DeJong, Ph.D., REFP, is Senior Advisor at DeJong-Richter and DeJong-Healy. DeJong co-founded Schools for the Children of the World. www.dejonginc.com
 
 
 
 

The post New Realities: It’s Time to Update Your Facility Plan appeared first on School Construction News.

]]>
Helping Haiti https://schoolconstructionnews.com/2010/08/10/architects-planners-join-rebuild-haiti-s-schools/
LEOGANE, Haiti — William DeJong, co-founder of Schools for the Children of the World, recalls broken cityscapes and rubble-choked communities where only the barest signs of rebuilding was visible and temporary living tents were everywhere during his latest trip to Haiti.

The post Helping Haiti appeared first on School Construction News.

]]>

LEOGANE, Haiti — William DeJong, co-founder of Schools for the Children of the World, recalls broken cityscapes and rubble-choked communities where only the barest signs of rebuilding was visible and temporary living tents were everywhere during his latest trip to Haiti.

It was on his fourth and most recent visit to the country back in June when DeJong started to see the beginnings of what he calls “a temporary or transitional phase” of development. New infrastructure was slowly taking shape and portions of the rubble, remnants of the January 12 earthquake that nearly destroyed Haiti, had been moved.

“When I first went there after the earthquake, I thought I saw about 100,000 tents,” says DeJong, in a telephone interview. “The second time I was there, I realized I was wrong: it was 200,000 tents. And more recently, I have been corrected – it’s more like 300,000 tents.”

Three organizations — SCW, the Council of Educational Facility Planners International, and the National Council of Structural Engineers Association — are in the process of developing 16 new schools to replace a few of the more than 4,000 schools that were damaged or destroyed in January’s 7.3-magnitude quake. Currently in the design phase, the schools will provide an academic home to some of the approximately one million students whose schools were displaced by the earthquake, DeJong says. The Spanish Red Cross will fund the projects, which range from $300,000 to $2 million.

New construction is slow in Haiti as aid organizations and Haitians are focusing first on building transitional facilities around the destroyed structures.

“A lot of the rubble is starting to get moved,” DeJong says. “I can’t tell you how much of the rubble is getting moved by hand. Many times, re-construction crews will take a hundred Haitians, put them in yellow shirts, supply them with hammers and picks, and send them to a rubble pile. By the end of the day they’ll have gone through and completely removed the rubble off that site.”

In the days following the earthquake, DeJong and his colleagues began searching the Internet for news on what was happening in the way of redevelopment, assessing what was needed and where it was needed most. Having financed and built new schools in poorer communities in Central America, South America and Africa, DeJong said his colleagues at SCW, and their counterparts at CEFPI, and NCSEA, saw Haiti as their next target for relief aid.

“For the last three months, we have been working with Haiti’s government leaders to determine what’s needed nationwide, such as the creation of a new school building authority,” DeJong says. “We started taking a look at what might be done with the school facilities, as far as new systems that could be put into the place. So far, we have basically drafted out a concept for a new school building authority that would attempt to build 3,000 schools in the next four to five years.”

To create such a plan, DeJong and his colleagues have worked closely with the Haitian Ministry of Education, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Haitian president’s office, and Haiti’s Presidential Commission on Education.

DeJong is also collaborating with the Paul Vallas, the superintendent of New Orleans Recovery School District, who was personally invited by Haiti’s first lady, Elisabeth Preval, to assess the country’s educational system.

The need for a new public school system in Haiti is nearly as great as the need for school buildings there, DeJong explained. The majority of Haiti’s approximately 15,000 schools are private institutions run by independent operators. Many of the private schools grew out of a lack of public academic facilities — a situation that was created due to Haitian economic conditions. DeJong describes the condition of the Haiti’s K-12 academic buildings as being “inadequate, and in very poor condition,” even before the earthquake struck.

“There are basically no standards, no guidelines, and no codes in place for new construction,” he says. “A lot of the private operators would simply take over a storefront or convert a house into a school and start charging tuition. And tuition, which may only be $100 or $200 per year, does not seem like a lot of money. But when you are only making $600 or $700 per year, it is a lot of money.”

In April, DeJong and several architects and planners began traveling to Leogane, a port city located about 18 miles west of Port-au-Prince. There, they performed site assessments, established a partnership with the Spanish Red Cross and began developing school sites. Of the 66 pre-earthquake schools they visited in the region, DeJong says only three were standing.

“There are a lot of other organizations in Haiti, including Save the Children and UNICEF, that are developing temporary schools out of tent materials or plywood,” DeJong says. “What we are focusing on is building permanent facilities. We hope to start construction by August or September on the first series of these projects.”


Classrooms set up in tents have been the status quo in Haiti since the Jan. 12 earthquake.

Several design firms across the United States are volunteering their time to develop the schools, which will be built by the Spanish Red Cross and Haitian construction firms.

Chuck Newman, co-founder of SCW, and CEO of the Naperville, Ill.,-based Newman Architecture, is leading an oversight group for the Haitian school construction project. Once the partner firms complete their designs, Newman, DeJong, and others will take over and finish the construction documents.

“The firms’ responsibilities are to meet with each community, listen to what their needs are, [and] develop a schematic plan in partnership with the Spanish Red Cross,” says Newman. “The Spanish Red Cross will be responsible for physically building the schools and establishing agreements with the contractors, and such.”

With hurricane season already upon the Caribbean nation, the immediate need for permanent schools in Haiti is even greater, Newman says.

Many of the temporary schools [and] structures that are already overcrowded with students are going up on the sites where the permanent schools need to go. Tearing them down to build new ones could hit a soft spot in many Haitians’ hearts as the first signs of progress start to appear, he says.

“There’s a great need for schools because so many of them in Leogane, maybe 80 percent of the schools there, are not habitable without major repairs,” Newman explained. “One of our objectives is to [construct] new buildings as quickly as we can so they don’t develop temporary structures on the sites. Plus, these temporary structures are not really intended to be hurricane resistant.”

Burt Hill Architects is just one of the architectural firms donating time to design new schools. The Pittsburgh-based BRA is creating a replacement for the Sainte Rose de Lima public school, which has a roster of approximately 1,100 students.

In June, BRA principal Rob Pillar and his staff visited the site in Leogane where the $1 million school will be built. When completed, the building will house 12 classrooms for first through sixth grades, eight rooms for grades seven through twelve, two science laboratories, a library, administration offices, and residences for the educators. The approximately 20,000-square-foot school will be arranged in back-to-back classroom building pods, with open walls on one side of each classroom, roof overhangs that provide shade, and naturally ventilated areas. All of the onsite buildings will stand about three feet off the ground, as the area is a natural floodplain.

“We hope to start construction in October, and we plan to go back to the site during construction, and again once the school is complete,” says Pillar, adding that the project was not just about the firm building a replacement school.

“We want to develop a relationship with the school caretakers and staff to help them create a future-focused sustainable educational system,” Pillar says.

BRA is currently looking for an educational nonprofit or company that will sponsor Sainte Rose on an ongoing basis.

DeJong says that compared to schools SCW has built in nearby Honduras, school construction costs are nearly twice as much in Haiti, largely due the high cost of materials. For a Haitian school with 400 students, it could cost more than $500,000 to build, he says.

“These projects range from $500,000 to a couple million dollars each,” DeJong says. “Each one is a fairly significant project when you think about a third-world country.”

DeJong says he expects many of the schools to be similar in design to projects SCW has done in Honduras — simple structures made of block concrete with no air conditioning or heating. Most of the schools planned for Haiti will go up within a year to 18 months, with more projects likely to be added as SCW and the other organizations continue development.

“For all practical purposes, I’m on sabbatical from my regular job as this has just become all consuming,” says DeJong, who is founder and senior advisor at the DeJong-Richter educational facility consultancy firm. “I get up at about 6 a.m. in the morning and I think about those people in Haiti who are living in tents and I think we have to get this moving, we have to keep going.”

Finding volunteers and financiers has not been a problem thus far, says DeJong, who has received positive response from the private and nonprofit industries worldwide, as well as governments, all wanting to pitch in.

“Just today, for instance, I received two calls,” DeJong says “One was from a bank in [the Republic of] Trinidad and Tobago that wants to donate a school, and the other from the Finnish Government, which wants to donate $5 million worth of schools.”

The post Helping Haiti appeared first on School Construction News.

]]>
Renovate or Build New? https://schoolconstructionnews.com/2010/06/10/renovate-or-build-new/ Renovate or build new? This age-old question goes far beyond renovation vs. new construction because it involves multiple issues and community stakeholders. However, the answer is very straightforward: provide the best place for students to learn.

 
While many people think renovating existing facilities is more expensive and time-consuming than building new ones, that’s not always the case.

The post Renovate or Build New? appeared first on School Construction News.

]]> Renovate or build new? This age-old question goes far beyond renovation vs. new construction because it involves multiple issues and community stakeholders. However, the answer is very straightforward: provide the best place for students to learn.

 
While many people think renovating existing facilities is more expensive and time-consuming than building new ones, that’s not always the case. In fact, renovation can often be accomplished for less than the cost of a new building. It just requires careful planning and conscientious effort. Michigan’s Grand Rapids Public School District is the perfect example.
 
Like many school districts nationwide, Grand Rapids experienced a school building boom in the 1920s and 1950s. In 2004, the district and community created a building improvement plan to determine appropriate school improvements.
 
The goal was to provide appropriate and attractive spaces flexible enough to meet the needs of new initiatives, extend the life of each building for more than 30 years, meet all health and safety codes, and comply with federal and local mandates. After all, the buildings were approximately 50 to 80 years old, and they were constructed before energy conservation, the American with Disabilities Act, and the advent of personal computers.
 
Nearly all of the buildings’ systems — roofs, boilers, electrical, mechanical, windows, etc. — had reached or gone beyond their life expectancies.
 
Phase I of the Building Improvement Plan involved the construction and renovation of seven elementary and four middle schools — four of which involved some debate regarding the question: renovate or build new?
 
The debate was quite short for two of the schools because it was clearly smarter and more cost-effective to renovate rather than build new. The estimated construction cost to renovate and build an addition at Harrison Park Elementary/Middle School was $24.9 million, while a new facility would have cost more than $30 million.
 
The building, built in 1924 with English gothic architecture, has obvious historic details that made it worth restoring. It reopened in September 2007, under budget and on time.
 
There was also little debate about Palmer Elementary School. This 1950s single-story school included revolutionary features for its time, such as excellent ventilation and natural light. In the current age of environmental awareness, the district decided to renovate and focus the planning process on green design
 
The estimated cost for a moderate renovation with an addition was $5.3 million, versus $10.9 million for a new building. To green it up even further, new ventilation, air conditioning, and more natural light were added to the facility.
 
The building also presented the ideal opportunity to recast current space. For example, the original gym became the media center because it was undersized for current physical education activities but the perfect size to host a library and computer lab. The school reopened in January 2007 — seven months ahead of schedule and on budget.
 
Burton Elementary/Middle School was a different story because it presented an example of renovation costing about the same as a new building. However, it was renovated to preserve its historic architectural detailing, which includes a Byzantine-style tiled entryway and terra cotta trim.
 
There were two more major reasons to renovate. First, there wasn’t enough property available to build a new facility, and second, the school had always been a point of pride for the community. It was the first school in Michigan that cost $1 million or more to build in 1925. The $28.2 million renovation project was completed in 2008.
 
Alger Middle School represented a good example of the district choosing to build new. The existing facility didn’t have enough square footage to match the district’s middle school standards. If it was renovated, it would have needed an addition, which would have under-utilized the existing building. The new building is 80,000 square feet and sits beautifully on the property.
 
The last of the eleven projects in Grand Rapids was Cesar E. Chavez Elementary, which opened in 2009. It wasn’t part of the original building improvement plan, but after several projects came in under the budget, it was added to the program. The original building was from the 1950s, but it was demolished and replaced with a new energy-efficient school with larger classrooms, team rooms for collaboration, a lunchroom separate from the gymnasium, and a rooftop garden.
 
Each school in the building improvement plan was custom-built with the latest school design and technology to help facilitate instruction and learning, increase safety and security, and enhance neighborhood use. Eight of the eleven projects are built with green building techniques, and five are eligible or have already been approved for LEED certification.
 
There’s no question this entire process revitalized the Grand Rapids community. People living in the neighborhoods where schools underwent renovation and construction made home improvements, which increased property values.
 
The building improvement plan also spurred related developments, such as street and park improvement. In addition, community members developed an interest in how community services reach their neighbors.
 
Renovating vs. renovation should be determined case by case. The Grand Rapids story resulted in approximately half of the schools renovated and half replaced.
 
These improvements did not happen by chance. It happened because district administrators, parents, teachers and community leaders actively participated in a planning process aimed at making the area a better place to live, learn, work and play.
  
William DeJong is Senior Advisor of DeJong-Richter and DeJong-Healy. He DeJong is the Co-Founder of Schools for the Children of the World. 

The post Renovate or Build New? appeared first on School Construction News.

]]>
Protect Your Investment https://schoolconstructionnews.com/2009/11/11/protect-your-investment-don-t-cut-the-m-o-budget/ DeJong
Conditions in world financial markets have improved and activity in the U.S. housing sector has increased, but the economy is still not good for school districts.

The post Protect Your Investment appeared first on School Construction News.

]]> DeJong
Conditions in world financial markets have improved and activity in the U.S. housing sector has increased, but the economy is still not good for school districts. Many are making substantial budget cuts, often including maintenance and operations.

It’s pretty obvious that school districts must maintain their facilities to protect the investments they’ve already made in new construction and major renovations. However, it’s often not easy to convince the people who hold the purse strings. That’s why it’s time to look to the past for lessons learned.

The current situation is reminiscent of the early 1980s. During that economic turndown of double-digit inflation, school districts experienced many of the same circumstances: money was short, enrollment was declining and maintenance and operations budgets had to compete with other operating costs, such as rising utility bills and teachers’ salaries. This resulted in fewer custodians and maintenance staff, as well as materials and supplies. It also gave new meaning to the term “deferred maintenance.” 

Unfortunately, the deferred maintenance of the 1980s is a major reason so many buildings were replaced or renovated during the past decade.

One of the more dramatic examples of this situation was a large middle school in an urban district of the Midwest. I visited the school in the early 1990s and witnessed what happens when the maintenance and operations budget is cut. 

The school had an indoor pool, but the filtration system had failed. No funds had been set aside to fix the filtration system, so the pool closed. Within several months the pool was drained and the building’s heating system was turned off. After going through a winter without heat, the roof failed. Not only did this ruin the ceiling, but it also caused rapid decay within the interior. The district had two choices: undergo a major renovation or replace the pool. This is a perfect example of short-term savings having a long-term cost effect.

Recently the Council of Educational Facility Planners International bestowed an award on an urban school for undergoing a comprehensive facility planning process resulting in educational facilities that serve the needs of students, staff and the community. Indeed, it was a great project.

Ironically, I visited the school several months prior to the award and was surprised to find five-foot weeds surrounding the building, as well as other evidence that the building, even though brand new, was not being properly maintained. Unfortunately, there is often a mentality that a new school doesn’t need ongoing maintenance. But like a new car, it will eventually fall apart if it doesn’t undergo proper maintenance.

Several states have attempted to protect school facility investments by requiring local districts to implement maintenance plans that establish sinking funds and/or earmark tax revenues for maintenance and operations. Unfortunately, not enough states have mandated these requirements, which mean insufficient funds are allocated for maintenance and operations.

Budgets are tight and school districts are caught between a rock and a hard place. There is no cookie-cutter answer to this problem, yet the overall premise is clear: further maintenance and operations budget cuts will have negative long-term consequences.

This is certainly not the time to cut the maintenance and operations budget because short-term savings have a long-term effect. It’s imperative that we learn from our past to protect our facility investments now.

 
William S. DeJong, Ph.D., REFP, is CEO of DeJONG, an educational facility-planning firm based in Dublin, Ohio.

The post Protect Your Investment appeared first on School Construction News.

]]>